Reading and further edification

Roberts, D. (2011) Fatal Invention: How Science, Politics, and Big Business Re-create Race in the Twenty-first Century.

McCormick-Huhn, K., Warner, L. R., Settles, I. H., & Shields, S. A. (2019). What If Psychology Took Intersectionality Seriously? Changing How Psychologists Think About Participants. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 43(4), 445–456. http://doi.org/10.1177/0361684319866430

Hovmand, P. S. (2009). Analyzing dynamic systems: a comparison of structural equation modeling and system dynamics modeling. Structural Equation Modeling, 212–234. http://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511542138.010

Henrich, J., Heine, S. J., & Norenzayan, A. (2010). The weirdest people in the world? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 33(2-3), 61–83. http://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X0999152X

Roberts, S. O., Bareket-Shavit, C., Dollins, F. A., Goldie, P. D., & Mortenson, E. (2020). Racial Inequality in Psychological Research: Trends of the Past and Recommendations for the Future. Perspectives on Psychological Science. http://doi.org/10.1177/1745691620927709

Simons, D. J., Shoda, Y., & Lindsay, D. S. (2017). Constraints on Generality (COG): A Proposed Addition to All Empirical Papers. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 12(6), 1123–1128. http://doi.org/10.1177/1745691617708630

Else-Quest, N. M., & Hyde, J. S. (2016). Intersectionality in Quantitative Psychological Research: I. Theoretical and Epistemological Issues. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 40(2), 155–170. http://doi.org/10.1177/0361684316629797

Else-Quest, N. M., & Hyde, J. S. (2016). Intersectionality in Quantitative Psychological Research: II. Methods and Techniques. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 40(3), 319–336. http://doi.org/10.1177/0361684316647953

And more...